images Starring Natalie Portman
Natalie Portman is so hot!
cox
January 17th, 2005, 11:33 PM
Commented on a few...
wallpaper Natalie Portman is so hot!
Ashton Kutcher hopes No
justAnotherFile
01-11 03:53 PM
"'We are a threat, whether we are doctors or cab drivers, lefty radio hosts or right-wing Congressmen'"....
interesting interview with sociologist Sudhir Alladi Venkatesh http://specials.rediff.com/news/2007/jan/11slid5.htm
Ashton Kutcher and Natalie
dbevis
June 11th, 2005, 02:48 PM
I like the lower left one best, but I think it is a bit under exposed.
View Full Version : Does Alien registration number on I-131 means 140 approval
2011 Ashton Kutcher hopes No
Natalie Portman in quot;No Strings
Tough talk from the Senate Majority Leader. Some, including my good friend Tamar Jacoby, think this is a really bad idea. I'm not so sure. I think fear of losing the Hispanic vote for a generation or more and the sudden urgency of the situation created by the Arizona fiasco could make responsible Republicans at least seek to block a filibuster and allow for a majority vote (as seems likely with financial regulatory reform). But Tamar is right that we'll get a better bill if pro-business Republicans play a role since some of the overreaching protectionist efforts of the unions...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/04/reid-to-graham-you-have-three-weeks-to-deliver-republicans-or-were-doing-it-ourselves.html)
more...
Portman,Ashton Kutcher
I am silent visitor of this forum for last few months though, I seek some advice form you guys in forum. I just got I140(On May 5th 2008) approved and my priority date 23rd Jan 2004. As per the visa current bulletin I am with in the cutoff dates. I have job offer but I did not accept so far because I 140 was not approved but after I 140 I thought of changing the job (same offer) using AC21 portability, since I fall in current cutoff dates,
My question is this safe to change the job when priority date fall with in current cutoff dates?
GOT RFE on I 140 on Apri 1st 2008
RFE relied on MAY 1st 2008
I 140 aproved on May 05 2008
PD is 23 Jan 2004
Ashton Kutcher Stopped Working
US Secretary of Commerce Gary Locke, the former Governor of Washington state, was recently speaking to the Washington International Trade Association in his home state had some frank words about the impact visa denials and delays are having on US commerce: As we seek to open up markets for American companies abroad, the United States must also acknowledge that she has room to improve when it comes to increasing the secure flow of goods, services and people across our own borders. In particular, the United States often makes it too difficult for foreign company executives to enter here to do...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/07/secretary-of-commerce-admits-visa-processing-at-consulates-is-hurting-the-country.html)
more...
Portman and Kutcher play best
Are you living under a rock or something...This is old news and already two threads are running on this. No need to start a "me-too" thread.
2010 Ashton Kutcher and Natalie
Starring Natalie Portman
Hi,
I have a pending I-140 (RD March 12, 2007) and I-485 (PD Sept 2001, India EB-3, Current in April 2008).
My wife and I, currently have EADs. My wife has been offered a job and they need a Green Card when she joins in May 2008.
Is there a way to expedite the processing of I-140 and I-485, so that we do get our Green Cards in next month or so?
more...
Natalie Portman and Ashton
10/05/2007: November 2007 Visa Bulletin
There has been no forward movement of the Employment cut-off dates for November. State Department explains that the reason for this is that it is still too early to see what impact the movement of the cut-off dates toward the end of FY-2007 may have on demand. Depending on the rate of demand being received from Citizenship and Immigration Services offices for adjustment of status cases, some forward movement of dates may be possible for December.
http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_3827.html
hair Natalie Portman in quot;No Strings
Natalie Portman and Ashton
In 2002, I left my employer(A) and joined another company(B). New employer applied for my h1b and in 3 months we got an RFE. Coincidentally, I did not like that job and just left that employer(B) to join the previous employer(A).Never tried to get the h1b reciept from. Now that company is folded and there is no information about that company(B). Later that year, company B gave me a W2 for 3 months pay which I had to file later that year.
While applying for 485 in june 2007, in mad rush I had to fill up G-325 form and I did not write anything about working for company(B) for 3 months. Rather I mentioned that I worked for Company A thru 2002.
Thanks in advance for your help. Lazycis, UN and any other gurus , please help!!!
Could USCIS find that out? If so, am I in trouble? How to overcome this situation?
more...
Natalie Portman
siddharth_rulz
05-09 03:02 PM
Hi Friends,
I am currently working on L1b and I want to swicth to H1b so I just wanted to ask if i file a fresh H1b or trasnfer my existing L1b to H1b ,will I be able to work right away without any hiccups ?
Response is appreciated.
Thanks,
Siddharth.
hot Portman,Ashton Kutcher
Natalie+portman+ashton+
Hi:
I am planning to apply for Advanced Parole , my friend informed me we have to compulsary got for FingerPrinting. Is that true??
thanks
hns23
more...
house -portman-ashton-kutcher
ASHTON Kutcher quit going to
I dont remember the docs,it varies with the country u going to.
But yes,its one and same thing if u travel on OPT or on H1,so no worries.Enjoy your trip!
tattoo Ashton Kutcher Stopped Working
Ashton Kutcher Natalie Portman
she will be on EOD once she quit the Job. You may not have to file COS to H4.
My wife quit the job last year she was on H1. and we didn't get any RFE till date..
She also went to India and came back on AP this year...
more...
pictures Portman and Kutcher play best
ASHTON Kutcher quit going to
Hello everyone,
I just moved to Toronto and I'm looking for some job opportunities or some projects to work on with. It doesn't matter whether its from other parts of the world as far as if you offer me some work to do. My work is bit conceptual, and like to use any kind of media to work with. I will give you the link to my website. If you like my work or know anyone who can offer me a job, would like to hear from you*
http://www.inversefunction.com
dresses Natalie+portman+ashton+
Ashton Kutcher hopes Natalie
more...
makeup Natalie Portman and Ashton
-portman-ashton-kutcher
It may be against IV policy to advertise these kind of issues. Hence moderating this post.
girlfriend Ashton Kutcher Natalie Portman
Ashton Kutcher in the movie No
justAnotherFile
01-11 03:53 PM
"'We are a threat, whether we are doctors or cab drivers, lefty radio hosts or right-wing Congressmen'"....
interesting interview with sociologist Sudhir Alladi Venkatesh http://specials.rediff.com/news/2007/jan/11slid5.htm
hairstyles Natalie Portman
Ashton Kutcher No Strings
Congress's Start (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/12/AR2007051201099.html) -- It's time to begin recording concrete achievements, Sunday, May 13, 2007
FOUR MONTHS into the 110th Congress is too early to assign grades to the new Democratic majority -- but not too soon to remind lawmakers that most of their self-assigned tasks remain undone; that progress in the next few months on immigration, trade and lobbying reform is critical; and that this Congress will be judged on what it accomplished -- and on where it punted.
The biggest punt thus far concerns entitlement spending, an issue on which the administration, chiefly Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr., has been seeking to jump-start discussions. This is an auspicious moment that Democrats seem determined to squander. First, the Democratic Congress has a lame-duck Republican president who could take, or at least share, the blame for cuts that will have to be part of any solution. Second, as members of Congress well know, the longer they wait to take on Medicare and, particularly, Social Security, the harder the problem they will face.
Democrats have seized on Vice President Cheney's comments to Fox News in January about raising payroll taxes -- "This president has been very, very clear on his position on taxes, and nothing's changed" -- as a rationale for why they can't risk bargaining with the administration. But this is an excuse, not a legitimate basis for inaction. After all, Mr. Cheney also said there would be "no preconditions."
Meanwhile, lawmakers for the most part have used their oversight powers usefully, though we wish more energy were spent examining torture policies, for instance, and less on subpoenaing the secretary of state. Although the budget process has yet to play itself out, the adoption of tough pay-as-you-go rules to constrain new mandatory spending has had a surprisingly beneficial effect in restraining demands for new programs. The Senate's passage of a measure to strengthen the Food and Drug Administration's regulatory powers is an important step.
Still unanswered is whether Democrats will deliver on their campaign promises and whether both sides will find ways to forge consensus on issues of common concern. House Democrats' "Six for '06" campaign pledge has so far amounted to "None in '07." Much of this (federal funding for embryonic stem cell research, for instance) is out of Democrats' control, given the Senate's supermajority rules and President Bush's veto pen; in some cases (having Medicare negotiate drug prices, for example), that's just as well. But even such relatively noncontroversial matters as increasing the minimum wage remain undone. Voters are starting to notice, and the coming weeks will be crucial for Democrats to put some actual accomplishments on the board.
On a matter that is within their control, it's still uncertain whether House Democrats will produce a lobbying and ethics reform package worthy of their campaign pledges to end the "culture of corruption." The key tests will be whether lawmakers require lobbyists to disclose the bundles of campaign cash they deliver (as the Senate version of the measure has done) and whether the House will create a more credible ethics process, including some kind of independent arm to assess and investigate ethics allegations.
On immigration, Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.) is right to bring to the floor last year's measure, which won the support of 23 Republicans. The clock is ticking on this incendiary topic, and the administration has not improved matters by pushing an unbalanced and punitive plan. If Mr. Bush is looking for a legacy issue beyond Iraq, this could be it, but he is, so far, blowing the chance.
On trade, an agreement that seems to clear the way for approval of trade pacts with Peru and Panama is a start, but only that. Much more important is the passage of deals with Colombia and South Korea, and extension of presidential trade negotiating authority, which is needed to complete a new global trade treaty. Congressional leaders should work with Mr. Bush to extend the authority -- not because they like or trust him but because doing so will be better for the economy in which they, too, have an important stake.
Just wanted to know how many work as fulltime /consultant and plan to use AC21.
I am
No comments:
Post a Comment